We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,734

UK: can a settlement agreement be unravelled? Hayward v Zurich Insurance Plc

  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2015

The Court of Appeal recently handed down its judgment in this important case, which considered whether a settlement agreement can be rescinded on the

Hayward v Zurich Insurance

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 7 2015

Weekly Update 2011 reported the earlier Court of Appeal decision in this case. The claimant commenced proceedings for personal injury against his

What does product mean in a product liability policy?

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 2 2015

In Aspen Insurance UK Limited v Adana Construction Limited 2015 EWCA Civ 176, the Court of Appeal considered the meaning of a "Product" under the

Court of Appeal considers meaning of a product under a contractors' Combined Liability Policy

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 1 2015

In Aspen Insurance UK Limited v Adana Construction Limited 2015 EWCA Civ 176, the Court of Appeal considered the meaning of a "Product" under the

Lloyd v Humphreys & Glasgow

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The claimant was exposed to asbestos by various employers between the 1950s and 1970s. He issued a claim for damages for asbestosis against some of

Hill Dickinson yacht focus spring - 2015

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • France, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

Clients have expressed concerns about the continuing uncertainty regarding the tax regime for charters in Spanish waters, particularly for non-EU

The BRILLANTE VIRTUOSO: part one

  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The High Court has recently issued its judgment in a claim brought by the owner of the BRILLANTE VIRTUOSO (the vessel) against a number of London

Court of Appeal reaffirms that rights of recovery and subrogation in situations of joint insurance will depend upon the terms of the underlying contractual relationship

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

In the recent cases of Gard Marine & Energy Ltd vChina National Chartering Co Ltd and China National Chartering Co Ltd v Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaishai

Unite v Liverpool Victoria

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 0414. The claimant trade union entered into an agreement with the defendant

Landmark Court of Appeal judgment paves the way for claims arising out of misuse of private info

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 30 2015

Upholding Tugendhat J's judgment in Vidal-Hall et al -v- Google (2014), the Court of Appeal has confirmed that (1) misuse of private information is a