We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

Misselling: a global perspective

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Netherlands, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 25 2013

Turbulent economic conditions and heightened levels of media, political and regulatory interest in banks' dealings with consumers are leading

International regulatory update 7 - 11 January 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Global, India, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

EMIR: Extension of scrutiny period for Commission Delegated Regulations Basel III: Basel Committee releases revised version of Liquidity Coverage

2012 in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 20 2012

This table provides an overview of the key developments in 2012 to date

General Counsel update - legal guide edition 32

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Myanmar, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2012

A summary of major developments in key areas

Airocean case - lessons learnt

  • Stamford Law Corporation
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • October 2 2012

Peter Madhavan (Madhavan) and Ong Seow Yong (Ong), two former IDs of Airocean, were acquitted by the High Court in July and their five-year disqualifications from holding office as directors were overturned

The Airocean appeal - the concepts of materiality and trade sensitive information

  • Colin Ng & Partners LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 18 2012

The concept of materiality applies to a wide spectrum of offences under the Securities and Futures Act Chapter 289, 2002 revised edition (“SFA”

Als Memasa & Anor v UBS AG 2012 SGCA 43

  • Wong Partnership
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 10 2012

A claim of misrepresentation in relation to the purchase of certain investment products should be allowed to proceed to trial for the full facts to be examined; further, the issue as to whether a non-reliance clause is effective should be fully considered at trial

Examining the validity of non-reliance clauses in investment management documents

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 6 2012

Non-reliance clauses are common fixtures in investment management agreements and account opening terms and conditions between financial intsitutions and their clients, protecting the institutions from any potential misadvice regarding investments and financial products

Singapore High Court overturns district court judgment and acquits directors in relation to offences concerning disclosure under the Securities and Futures Act

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • August 30 2012

The Singapore High Court, in Madhavan Peter v Public Prosecutor and other appeals 2012 SGHV 153, overturned the District Court's judgment against independentnon-executive director Peter Madhavan ("Madhavan"), Chief Operating Officer Chong Keng Ban Johnson Chong ("Chong") and independentnon-executive director On Seow Yong ("Ong"

Airocean directors cleared of disclosure offences under the Securities & Futures Act

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • August 7 2012

The Securities and Futures Act ("SFA") sets out a number of disclosure requirements which listed companies are expected to comply with