We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Singapore court holds “forfeiture-for-competition” clause unenforceable

  • ATMD Bird & Bird LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • November 8 2012

In Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd 2012 SGCA 42, the Singapore Court of Appeal has held that a clause under which deferred incentive awards to an employee would be forfeited if he competed with the company (Forfeiture-for-competition clause) was a restraint of trade

Employment Act - termination with notice now subject to MOM intervention for “unfair dismissal”

  • Bird & Bird
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • July 3 2009

Employers will know that the Employment Act (EA) was amended with effect on 1 January 2009 to "update the EA to ensure that it remains relevant and responsive to the changing labour market conditions"