Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 140

Do-it-yourself funding for class actions in Australia takes an interesting twist

Jones Day
-
Australia
-
June 7 2013

Third party litigation funders may see their current stranglehold on the lucrative class action market start to weaken after the Australian Federal

ASIC issues litigation funding guidance

Clayton Utz
-
Australia
-
June 6 2013

With the expansion of litigation funding driving an increase in class actions being pursued against corporates across Australia, questions have arisen

A win for financial advisers

Lander & Rogers
-
Australia
-
June 4 2013

The financial adviser made recommendations to his client (the plaintiff) regarding $7 million she had received from the settlement of divorce

Will Lehman eat porridge for SCDOs?

King & Wood Mallesons
-
Australia
-
May 7 2013

The liquidators of Lehman Brothers Australia are appealing a landmark Federal Court decision that found it liable for losses suffered by a number of

Holding ratings agencies to account: court issues landmark decision

Piper Alderman
-
Australia
-
April 16 2013

The Federal Court of Australia recently handed down a landmark decision in which ratings agency Standard & Poor's was held accountable for the

360 Capital funds management update why no changes to constitutions

Gadens Lawyers
-
Australia
-
April 5 2013

It’s been some months since the appeal case in 360 Capital which made the funds management community reconsider the way in which a responsible

Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission 2012 HCA 39 (Australia, High Court, 2 October 2012)

Wong Partnership
-
Australia
-
April 4 2013

The company in question was Fortescue Metals Group Ltd ("Fortescue). In 2004, Fortescue entered into agreements ("Agreements") with three Chinese

Standard & Poor’s held liable for investor’s loss in Australia

Nabarro LLP
-
Australia, United Kingdom
-
March 7 2013

On 5 November 2012 judgment was given by the Federal Court of Australia in favour of 12 local councils, who sought to recover losses suffered after

Holding ratings agencies to account - The Federal Court’s landmark decision in Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services

Piper Alderman
-
Australia
-
February 26 2013

In November 2012, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in Bathurst Regional Council & Ors v Local Government

Financial product risk disclosure including for wholesale clients

Piper Alderman
-
Australia
-
February 22 2013

Some important principles concerning risk disclosure arise out of the recent decisions in the Federal Court of Wingecarribee Shire Council v Lehman

next >

Search results

Do-it-yourself funding for class actions in Australia takes an interesting twist

ASIC issues litigation funding guidance

A win for financial advisers

Will Lehman eat porridge for SCDOs?

Holding ratings agencies to account: court issues landmark decision

360 Capital funds management update why no changes to constitutions

Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission 2012 HCA 39 (Australia, High Court, 2 October 2012)

Standard & Poor’s held liable for investor’s loss in Australia

Holding ratings agencies to account - The Federal Court’s landmark decision in Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services

Financial product risk disclosure including for wholesale clients

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea