We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,051

Court of Appeal rules on similarity of marks and “relevant market” for Mr ZOGS SEX WAX goods

  • Henry Hughes
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • September 25 2014

In a decision on a trade mark opposition, the New Zealand Court of Appeal (Sexwax Incorporated v Zoggs International Limited 2014 NZCA 311) has

Copyright infringement, global headlines, and the case between Eminem and National

  • James & Wells Intellectual Property
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • September 24 2014

Not a good look is at worst what the New Zealand public will have thought when the media reported that rapper Eminem was suing the National

Just a case of ‘bad PR’ for National?

  • James & Wells Intellectual Property
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • September 24 2014

Not a good look is at worst what the New Zealand public will have thought when the media reported that rapper Eminem was suing the National

Shifting the burden: the Supreme Court rules on assigning contracts

  • Bell Gully
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • September 22 2014

When can you transfer contractual rights and obligations to someone else? The Supreme Court has changed the rules in Savvy Vineyards v Karaka Estate

Single newspaper advertisement sufficient to defeat revocation action in New Zealand trade mark case

  • Davies Collison Cave
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • September 22 2014

The High Court of New Zealand has recently held that a single newspaper advertisement was sufficient use of a trade mark to defeat an application for

Due diligence process in Feltex IPO "very thorough"

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • September 17 2014

The importance of robust due diligence processes in significant capital raisings is a key take-out from the High Court decision this week clearing

Court of Appeal carpet decision puts acid on advertisers

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • September 15 2014

The Court of Appeal judgment in a dispute between carpet manufacturers Godfrey Hirst NZ and Cavalier Bremworth makes clear that suppliers cannot rely

Jack Wills, McDonald’s, Bunnings v Masters, Tesco, Cadbury, Coke v Pepsi and much, much more 15 recent case “bites” and 5 tips on brand protection in the retail space for 2014 so far

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, New Zealand, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 12 2014

2014 has been a topsy-turvy year so far in the retail and FMCG spaces in terms of trade mark decisions in Australia, New Zealand and the UK and EU

Case study: limiting ICT B2B liabilities under new NZ law - updated

  • Wigley + Company
  • -
  • New Zealand, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 12 2014

Speed read A claim against a multi-national ICT supplier by an English City Council is a great example of how the new Fair Trading Act legislation

Communicate clearly elections under construction contracts

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • September 11 2014

If a construction contract gives you a choice whether to exercise a contractual election, then you need to communicate clearly your decision to