We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 350

The dishonest lawyer: a cautionary tale for all solicitors and their clients

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The High Court case of Cityside Asset Pty Ltd v 1 Solution Ltd 2012 NZHC 1382 involved a breach of a franchise agreement following its termination

Use of a generally descriptive word does not constitute trademark infringement

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • May 1 2013

InterCity operates InterCity Coachlines and owns the INTERCITY registered trademark. Recently, InterCity sought interim orders restraining Nakedbus

A vendor may be liable for a misrepresentation made to a third party associated with a purchaser

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In Rondova v When Routine Bites Hard Limited 2013 NZHC 267, Justice Woodhouse examined when a misrepresentation will be brought to the knowledge of

"Deliberate default" and "wilful misconduct" - what do they actually mean?

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 5 2011

The terms "deliberate default" and "wilful misconduct" often appear in IT contract liability clauses and can be the source of much debate

Without prejudice - High Court refuses to expand exceptions to privilege over settlement-related communications

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • October 18 2012

In McCulloch & Ors v Quinn & Ors 2012 NZHC 1850, the High Court has provided further guidance as to the scope of "without prejudice" privilege

Business decisions now under the spotlight in redundancies

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • April 23 2013

In another significant change to redundancy law, last month the Employment Court ruled that it can scrutinise an employer's decision to make an

Representations and warranties - can one clause be both at the same time?

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 13 2013

A recent English High Court decision, while not binding in New Zealand, illustrates the difference between representations and warranties in sale and

An agreement to arbitrate is upheld notwithstanding a defect

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The Court of Appeal has recently recognised the importance of upholding and enforcing arbitration agreements and awards, even where part of the

Interest will not accrue on costs until a costs order is made

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • May 1 2013

In Chesterfields Preschools Ltd & Ors v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue 2013 NZCA 44, the Court of Appeal considered whether interest could be

Key aspects of shadow directors: Buzzle v Apple computer

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • July 1 2011

We reported on the first instance decision in this litigation last year (see here