We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 4,459

Still no concrete approach for patent eligibility of computer-related inventions in the US

  • AJ Park
  • -
  • New Zealand, USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has released the results of its en banc hearing of CLS Bank International v

Patent watch: Dey, L.P. V. Sunovion Pharms., Inc.

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

"An agreement of confidentiality, or circumstances creating a similar expectation of secrecy, may negate a 'public use' where there is not

NDCA issues order on early damages disclosure

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On March 8, 2013, the NDCA issued an opinion in Eon Corp. IP Holding LLC v. Sensus USA Inc., No. C-12-01011 EMC (EDL) (Doc. No. 657), concerning

Gunn v. Minton: malpractice claims involving patent issues do not create exclusive federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1338

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

28 U.S.C. 1138 provides that federal courts shall have jurisdiction over any case "arising under any act of Congress relating to patents" and

ALJ Bullock terminates investigation based on settlement agreement in Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets (337-TA-855)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued Order No. 106 in Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same and Products

ALJ Pender issues order partially terminating investigation in Certain Electronic Devices Including Mobile Phones and Tablet Computers (337-TA-847)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 14 partially terminating the investigation in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile

Five, six, or seven opinions in Alice Corp.: little agreement on 101

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

Circuit judges continue to differ regarding the test for patent subject-matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. The en banc decision in CLS

ALJ Gildea denies motions to strike testimony in Certain Semiconductor Chips with DRAM Circuitry (337-TA-819)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On April 23, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 18 and Order No. 19 (both dated March 26, 2013) regarding motions to

ALJ Rogers grants motion to strike supplemental interrogatory response and denies motion to respond out of time in Certain Integrated Circuit Chips (337-TA-859)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 19 2013

On May 9, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. Issued Order No. 19 granting Respondents LSI Corporation and Seagate Technology's (collectively

When judges collide: en banc CAFC fails to clarify law regarding patent subject matter eligibility

  • Vedder Price PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

On May 10, 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued its decision in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp., which many had