We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 432

Leveyfilm, Inc. v. Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 8 2014

Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC and related entities obtained summary judgment in copyright infringement action brought by owner of photograph used

Christoff v. Nestle USA, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2009

In a unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court holds that the “single publication” rule applies to a claim for the unauthorized commercial use of a person’s likeness and that the “discovery rule” does not apply to a claim involving the production of product labels because it undermines the single publication rule; the court remands to the trial court the issue of whether the production of product labels over a five-year period constitutes a single integrated publication and thus triggers the two-year statute of limitations when first published

The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust v. Spielberg

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2010

Court grants the producers of the motion picture Disturbia summary judgment in a copyright infringement action brought by the owner of the copyright to Rear Window, the short story made into an Alfred Hitchcock film, finding that the common elements between the two works are not protectible

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2012

District court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement action brought by Louis Vuitton against Warner Bros., holding that because defendant’s use of a “knock-off” version of one of plaintiff’s bags in the film The Hangover: Part II was artistically relevant, and because any confusion it might cause was due to third party’s infringing product and not to defendant’s film, defendant’s non-commercial use was protected under First Amendment freedom of expression

Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2013

Ninth Circuit affirms district court order denying motion to strike, under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, right-of-publicity claims asserted by

Gibson Guitar Corp. v. Viacom International, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2013

District court grants Viacom’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Lanham Act and related state law claims for alleged unauthorized use of its trademark

Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 16 2014

Second Circuit rules that doctrine of “fair use” allows consortium of university libraries to create full-text searchable database of copyrighted

American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2014

U.S. Supreme Court holds that Aereo's near-contemporaneous transmission of broadcast television programs over Internet to subscribers violates

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2012

Ninth Circuit reverses district court’s grant of summary judgment in copyright action alleging that Aeropostale infringed upon registered textile design, finding genuine disputes of material fact on access and substantial similarity

Lewis v. Activision Blizzard

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 24 2013

District court grants summary judgment against former employee "game master" of defendant videogame company, finding that sound recordings of