We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 65

Contractual terms: when an interpreter is required

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 8 2013

Few commercial contracts are so clear that everyone would read them in exactly the same way. So what happens where contractual provisions are

How to get out of tricky situations-settlement agreements

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 8 2013

I have recently come across a number of situations where the most expedient solution will be for the parties to agree a commercial settlement and

Contract risk management tackling risks head on

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 12 2012

Before entering into any contract both parties need to decide what losses or liabilities they are prepared to accept if things go wrong

Bonuses and blind spots - Newcastle International Airport v Eversheds

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 22 2012

Newcastle International Airport’s £8 million plus claim against Eversheds has failed

Going back to basics: ensuring your side letter is more than a mere ”agreement to agree”

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 12 2012

The Barbudev litigation arises out of the negotiations and subsequent sale of Eurocom Plovdiv EOOD (EP), to the Warburg Pincus Group (WPG

Claims against dissolved companies

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 30 2012

If a dissolved company is restored to the Register of Companies, under section 1032(1) of the Companies Act 2006 it is "deemed to have continued in existence as if it had not been dissolved or struck off the register"

Piercing the corporate veil

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 30 2012

The court was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in VTB v Nutritek which decided that it was not possible to pierce the corporate veil so as to treat a puppet company as anything other than a legal person formally distinct from the puppeteer

Accountants’ liability to third parties

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 30 2012

The court struck out the claim against KPMG on the ground that it did not owe the claimant a duty of care and, in any event, the claim was time-barred

Administration appointments - has the court finally got its act together?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 20 2012

Re BXL Services (2012) EWHC 1877 was yet another familiar tale of the directors resolving to appoint administrators, but not then serving a formal notice of intention on the company

A continuing duty of care?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 11 2012

Two recent cases considered the question of whether professionals owe a continuing duty to their clients

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy