We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 281

Renwick v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects latent damage in construction claims

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 22 2011

The claimant homeowners must have had the knowledge required under s14A of the Limitation Act 1980 for bringing an action against the second defendant, William Attwell and Associates (Attwell), more than three years before they began proceedings against the firm

Fraudulent claims in all their guises

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 20 2014

You couldn't come up with a more confusing legal tangle if you tried than that concerning claims tainted by fraud. The main source of confusion is

Jurisdiction clauses

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2010

This case concerns a series of complex agreements relating to equities and foreign exchange trading concluded between the claimant, an investment bank domiciled in Germany, and the defendant company incorporated in the Turks and Caicos Islands

Execution of deeds

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 28 2011

For a document to be enforceable as a deed, it must be delivered as a deed

When should a defendant make a Calderbank offer?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 31 2012

Recent developments have reduced the costs protection afforded by Calderbank offers and asserted the importance of making fully compliant Part 36 offers

Disclosure of insurance and funding details

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 3 2012

A party to litigation is only required to reveal its insurance position and the means by which it is funding its claim or defence in certain circumstances

The merger doctrine

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 24 2011

Parties who have had a dispute heard by a judicial tribunal of competent jurisdiction should not be allowed to litigate the same issues in the courts

E-disclosure

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 27 2012

Where costs were wasted by reason of one party’s failures regarding the disclosure of electronic documents, it was appropriate to award the other party the costs in question

Jones v Kaney leap-frog appeal to Supreme Court

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 28 2010

The claimant brought a personal injury claim following a road accident

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v Markandan & Uddin meaning of “completion”

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 2 2012

Where the defendant firm of solicitors had caused, through no fraud of their own, mortgage monies paid to it to be paid out to fraudsters in breach of the terms of their instructions and authority, it had acted in breach of trust