We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 519

Standard & Poor’s held liable for investor’s loss in Australia

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 7 2013

On 5 November 2012 judgment was given by the Federal Court of Australia in favour of 12 local councils, who sought to recover losses suffered after

Input tax recovery: BAA fails to take off in the Court of Appeal

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 5 2013

In the Court of Appeal: BAA Ltd has lost its battle to recover £6.7m of input tax incurred by a special purchase vehicle (SPV), during the course of

Supreme Court: discrimination against part-time workers

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 26 2013

The Supreme Court has decided that part-time fee-paid judges are "workers" protected by the Part Time Workers Directive, as their relationship with

UK competition reforms to create new “opt-out” class actions and encourage private actions for damages

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 7 2013

Government proposals relating to private actions for competition damages will make it easier to bring actions in the UK and will introduce class

ONEL: what constitutes genuine use of a Community Trade Mark?

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • February 5 2013

On 19 December 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its long-anticipated judgment in the ONELOMEL case. This

Civil partnership: Employment Tribunal awards full pension rights

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2013

In Innospec v Walker the Employment Tribunal (ET) has held that the provision in the Equality Act 2010 restricting the requirement to backdate

Financial Ombudsman Service: claimants allowed to seek further damages in court

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 30 2013

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can award compensation up to a maximum of £150,000. Once an award has been made, the claimant can decide

LPP: naked self interest replaced by functionality?

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 29 2013

In a landmark decision involving the great and the good of the legal world, the Supreme Court has confirmed that legal professional privilege (LPP

(Un)lawful terminations, religion discrimination and holiday rights of healthy workers

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 29 2013

A number of judgments, published in the last few weeks, are likely to affect the day-to-day working practices of many of our readers. They cover a

High Court rules FOS decisions may not be “final and binding”

  • Nabarro LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 8 2013

The High Court has held that investors who accept a decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can still go to court to recover damages in