We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,278

Court orders party that mistakenly paid award to wrong entity must pay agreed upon interest on award

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

As we reported on November 1, 2012, a federal court confirmed an arbitration award in favor of AXA Versicherung AG in a long-running reinsurance

Equitable tolling allowed in alleged scheme reinsuring private mortgage insurance

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Plaintiff homeowners filed a putative class against Bank of America Corp. ("BOA"), Bank of America Reinsurance Corp. ("BOARC") and three primary

Because they can: federal judges in Pennsylvania are dismissing insurers’ “common” declaratory judgment cases

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Insurance companies, like other businesses, generally prefer to litigate disputes with consumers in federal court, and they often invoke diversity

Federal judges in Brooklyn are making it easier to pursue fraud claims against no-fault medical providers

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The Eastern District of New York, which includes the New York City Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, has been home to some of the most colorful

Eighth Circuit: broad service of suit provision in insurance policy endorsement precludes arbitration

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

In a prior post, we reported the district court's denial of the insurer's motion to compel arbitration in Union Electric Co. v. Aegis Energy

En banc Ninth Circuit holds arbitration clause is not unconscionable, following Concepcion

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

Former students of a failed flight-training school brought a putative class action against the bank that originated their student loans and the loan

The Westphal shocker: how did a Florida court decide that a 19-year-old limit on workers’ compensation benefits is unconstitutional? Is substantive due process back?

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 4 2013

In Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, No. 1D12-3563 (Fla. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2013), a Florida appellate court recently ruled that a 2-year limit on

Court allows reinsurer discovery despite “follow the settlements” defense

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2013

A Connecticut federal court decided some thorny discovery issues in a reinsurance dispute between Travelers and one of its reinsurers, Excalibur. The

Seventh Circuit rejects novel DOL position in affirming summary judgment for retirement plan service provider in revenue sharing class action

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2013

May 1, 2013 -- In an important appellate victory for the industry in the longrunning series of so-called "revenue sharing" cases, the United States

Court holds that Florida law applies to tort claims brought by insurer against Floridian and London reinsurance brokers

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

We reported earlier on an action brought by Instituto Nacional de Seguros ("INS"), a Costa Rican state-owned insurer, against Florida insurance