We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,895

Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 2013-1567 (July 7, 2013)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

Where some, but not all, findings of infringement are reversed but no remand is sought, and a general damage award is consistent with the mandate

Aaron's alleged to have violated FCRA in employment practices

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

A complaint filed in a Georgia federal court contains allegations that Aaron's Inc. violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") by refusing to

Align Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 2013-1240, -1363 (July 18, 2014)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

International Trade Commission must follow its own regulations, which provide that only an "Initial Determination," not an "Order," is subject to

More bad news in the trend of lawsuits against non-executive directors over their own compensation

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

Lawsuits against directors, officers, and the company alleging that the compensation paid or awarded to one or more executives was excessive

Raymond E. Stauffer v. Brooks brothers Group, Inc., No. 2013-1180 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

The changes to the false marking statute under the America Invents Act are retroactive; any existing or future plaintiff must be a party that has

Appellate courts issue conflicting opinions on subsidies for individuals obtaining health coverage in the federal exchange

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

On July 22, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down subsidies for individuals who participate in the federal health care

Is your bonus plan subject to ERISA?

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

A recent court case drew our attention to an issue we haven't blogged on for several years: whether ERISA requirements apply to a company's bonus

Antitrust and competition the EU weekly briefing (21 July 2014)

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 21 2014

On 17 July 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down its judgments (Case C-55312 P and Case C-55412 P) in appeals by the Commission

California legislative update

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

Since our last annual California Legislative Update in October 2013, California has enacted a number of new employment laws that have implications

Fifth Circuit case highlights tension between compensation plans and ERISA

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

This week, the Fifth Circuit in Tolbert v. RBC Capital Markets Corporation held that a company's wealth accumulation plan (WAP) was a pension benefit