We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 877

The new promotional rules: “there are no new promotional rules”

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2014

There is resounding evidence that physicians and patients rely on the Internetincluding social medial platformsto research and

HarperCollins Publishers LLC v. Open Road Integrated Media LLP

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 6 2014

District court grants publisher's motion for permanent injunction to enjoin defendant from publishing e-book version of children's novel Julie of the

Adobe Systems Inc. v. Kornrumpf

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 9 2014

Ninth Circuit affirms grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Adobe Systems Inc., holding that first sale doctrine was not available as defense

Two taxpayers lose income tax deductions for spousal support payments

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2013

Two recent Tax Court cases serve as a reminder that the income tax deduction for the payment of spousal support is subject to some very specific rules

Wilson v. The Walt Disney Co.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2014

Identifying numerous similarities, the court allowed the plaintiff filmmaker to pursue a claim that Disney's teaser trailer for Frozen infringed on

Dryer v. National Football League

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

District court grants summary judgment in favor of NFL and against former professional football players who claimed that NFL's use of video footage

Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2013

Ninth Circuit affirms district court order denying motion to strike, under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, right-of-publicity claims asserted by

Vijay v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 3 2014

District court declines to find that preemption warrants dismissal of all claims brought by actor in "Titanic," but grants defendant film companies'

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

U.S. Supreme Court finds FCC's indecency rulings regarding isolated utterances of profanity and brief depictions of female anatomy to be unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process

UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor