We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 881

Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

District court grants summary judgment in favor of publisher of military-action video game Call of Duty: Ghosts on trademark infringement claims

Panoramic Stock Images, Ltd v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

District court denies textbook publisher McGraw-Hill's motion for summary judgment on its statute of limitations defense to stock photography

Two taxpayers lose income tax deductions for spousal support payments

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2013

Two recent Tax Court cases serve as a reminder that the income tax deduction for the payment of spousal support is subject to some very specific rules

Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 6 2008

The California Supreme Court ruled that the Talent Agencies Act applies to managers as well as agents, and that a management contract can be severed and partially enforced even if a manager violates the Talent Agency Act

Capitol Records Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2012

Circuit court reinstates $222,000 statutory damages award against defendant, individual, for willful infringement related to her downloading and making available through peer-to-peer file-sharing service 24 copyrighted sound recordings of plaintiffs, holding that award did not violate due process standards and that plaintiff was entitled to broader injunction

Hold the phone: dramatic increase in California “illegal recording” class actions

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 13 2013

We have recently observed a dramatic uptick in California consumer class actions alleging that businesses have illegally recorded telephone

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

U.S. Supreme Court finds FCC's indecency rulings regarding isolated utterances of profanity and brief depictions of female anatomy to be unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process

Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 12 2013

First Circuit affirms judgment in favor of recording companies, holding that statutory damage award of $675,000 for willfully infringing 30

Mattel v. MGA Entertainment

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

Ninth Circuit vacates jury verdict and related damages, fees and costs award in connection with MGA’s misappropriation of trade secrets counterclaim, finding that that counterclaim was not compulsory and not permissible, and affirms attorneys’ fees and costs awarded to MGA under the Copyright Act

Jules Jordan Video, Inc. v. 144942 Canada Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2010

Ninth Circuit holds that adult filmmaker’s right of publicity claim under California state law is preempted by the federal Copyright Act and that the district court erred in entering judgment as a matter of law that plaintiff employee lacked standing to sue for infringement under the “work for hire” doctrine where plaintiff employer and plaintiff employee were one and the same