We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Revised MARPOL Annex V: just who should take out the trash?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • March 8 2013

Following a review by the Correspondence Group established by the Marine Environment Protection Committee in 2006, various amendments to MARPOL Annex

Resolving international construction disputes litigation or arbitration?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • October 29 2012

As we have discussed in previous alerts in this series, many claims can arise under international construction contracts

Section 2(a)(iii): the suspense continues

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Global, United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 12 2012

Anyone with a passing knowledge of derivatives law will be aware of the controversy created by section 2(a)(iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement

Piracy update: charterers' obligation to pay hire in case of seizure and to reimburse additional premiums

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • December 8 2009

It has recently been widely opined that a charterer would continue to be liable to pay hire if a vessel is seized by pirates, because such an event would not fall within the commonly encountered NYPE clause 15

Ruling re non-U.S. bankruptcy creates global implications

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Global, USA
  • -
  • January 31 2008

The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has held that a bankruptcy trustee appointed in a non-U.S. bankruptcy case did not need authority from a U.S. court to take possession and control of a foreign debtor’s assets located in the United States, and transfer them