We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 155

Spoliation shrinks $350 million to $100 million

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

A patent owner saw more than 70 of a $350 million damages award evaporate when the court found it had spoliated documents. Even though the district

SCOTUS unanimously rules GM soybean patent infringed

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the "exhaustion doctrine" does not apply in the context of a patented genetically modified (GM) seed, and

Federal Circuit issues seven opinions on patentability of software innovations

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The en banc Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has divided over whether method and computer-readable media claims and system claims are directed to

Marking defense rears its head: limits damages period

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The AIA limited claims arising from “false marking.” Nonetheless, the marking statute tripped up Plaintiff in Kimberly-Clark Worldwide. As to some of

Plaintiff’s damages case survives Daubert and in limine challenges

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The Avocent court considered a variety of challenges to Plaintiff’s damages evidence, including late disclosure of damages-related fact testimony and

When it rains, it pours: court grants plaintiff fees, interest, doubles damages, and supplemental damages

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The Alps South court found for Plaintiff on every damages-related post-trial issue after the jury found the patent valid and willfully infringed

Right to sue for damages not assigned

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The court in Nano-Second ruled an assignment must contain an express provision allowing the assignee to sue for infringement occurring prior to the

Defense expert opens way for $85 million award after plaintiff precluded from putting on evidence

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

As a Defendant, think long and hard about whether to use a damages expert when the patentee has been precluded from presenting a reasonable royalty

Federal Circuit addresses pleading standards for patent infringement claims

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a federal district court erred by relying on an incorrect pleading standard in dismissing

Genetic technologies settles infringement suit over non-DNA coding technology

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2013

Genetic Technologies Ltd. (GTG) has reportedly settled a patent infringement lawsuit filed in late 2012 against PreventionGenetics. While the terms

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy