Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-2 of 2
Insider stock sales that were not unusual did not raise inference of scienter
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 10 2009
Plaintiffs, purchasers of the common stock of a sportswear manufacturing company, commenced a class action litigation against the company and two of its officers and directors, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Remand appropriate because fraud claim did not necessarily raise federal issue
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 10 2009
The plaintiff filed a complaint in California state court alleging four state law causes of action, including claims for fraud, in connection with a "hostile takeover" of the plaintiff
