We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 213

Supreme Court asked to clarify the reach of U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

On March 16, 2015, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc. (AU Optronics) and Motorola Mobility LLC separately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify

Seventh Circuit upholds dismissal of text messaging price-fixing claims

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

On Thursday, April 9, 2015, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless LLC

Abuse of IP rights under China's antitrust rules: recent cases have a potentially serious impact

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • March 22 2013

Corporations doing business in China, based on their intellectual property (IP) rights, need to be aware of the potentially serious impact of China's

The Advocate General of the EU clarifies position on enforcement of SEPs

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • December 30 2014

Despite the fact that standard-essential patents (SEPs) have been on the agenda of the European Union (EU) competition law debate for some time now

Judge rules in favor of DOJ finding BazaarvoicePowerreviews merger anticompetitive

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 13 2014

On January 8, 2014, Judge Orrick of the Northern District of California ruled that Bazaarvoice's acquisition of competitor Power Reviews violated

Rambus decision: lawful monopolist’s allegedly deceptive conduct not actionable under the antitrust laws

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2008

Despite the D.C. Circuit decision, firms should remain cautious in dealing with standard-setting bodies

In P Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission: exchanges between in-house lawyers and their employers

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 4 2010

In P Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission C-55007, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has dismissed an appeal by Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd against the decision of the General Court in 2007 that advice given by an in-house lawyer is not protected by legal privilege in EU competition cases

German antitrust regulator steps up the fight against gun-jumping

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • Germany
  • -
  • June 30 2011

More than 100 countries worldwide have merger control regimes, which require parties to reportable transactions to notify antitrust regulators and obtain competition clearance

Lanham Act attorneys’ fees awarded in the absence of damages

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that even in the absence of an award of damages on a Lanham Act false advertising claim, a party can recover attorneys’ fees after obtaining an injunction that confers substantial benefit to the public

ECJ gets tough with the Commission on parental liability

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • October 19 2011

A number of recent judgments suggest that European courts are getting tougher with the Commission on parental liability