We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 546

Federal Circuit has appellate jurisdiction even where damages, willfulness have not been determined

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit did not take a position on the propriety of bifurcating damages and willfulness, to the

Supreme Court to Myriad: isolated DNA sequences are not patent-eligible subject matter

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

The Supreme Court of the United States has released its highly anticipated decision in AMP et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al., on the patenting

High Court Holds Sale of Third-Party Coffee Pods Not an Infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 12 2013

On 22 April 2013, the High Court of England and Wales held in Nestec SA and Others v Dualit Ltd and Others 2013 EWHC 923 (Pat) that Nestec's patent

No double take in sunglasses spat

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Zenni Optical LLC Addressing the issue of whether collateral estoppel applies when claim construction issues overlap, the U. S

ITC issues new final rules on Section 337 Practice and Procedure

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has amended its Rules of Practice and Procedure concerning rules of general application

Form over substance?no review of patent validity on remand if accused infringer failed to file a cross-appeal after a judgment of non-infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

Addressing whether a lower court on remand can properly grant relief under Rule 60(b) if the beneficiary of the relief failed to file a cross-appeal

Large damages ok, but injunctive relief too broad

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

Addressing a finding of infringement that resulted in a lost-profits and reasonable royalty damages award of more than $300 million, the U. S. Court

New uses of known compositionsmethods not obvious

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

Affirming-in-part a district court’s finding of validity, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a claimed method was not

Functional limitation saves “spaced relationship” from indefiniteness

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

Addressing the issue of indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. 112 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a summary judgment of

Supreme Court to hear licensee standing case

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari in a license dispute involving licensed defibrillator patents in which a DJ plaintiff