We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 2,060

Jackpot! The Federal Circuit revives aristocrats indirect infringement claims in view of Akamai

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of divided infringement in the wake of the en banc Akamai decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated

Infringement damages limited to U.S. sales and must not be speculative

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

In a decision addressing several damages-related issues, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a patentee's damages award

No discovery permitted in inter partes reexamination proceedings

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing for the first time whether 35 U.S.C. 24 empowered a district court to issue a subpoena in an inter partes reexamination proceeding

Fourth Circuit rejects post-trial preclusion ruling in paper towel “stuffing” saga

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has now weighed in on the latest turn of events a long-standing dispute between Georgia Pacific

Patent marking: an extrajudicial admission that the product is covered by the patent but not an estoppel

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing for the first time whether marking a product with a patent number creates an estoppel preventing a later assertion that the product is not

Affidavits are not required to challenge prior art enablement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of whether an anticipatory prior art reference was enabled during prosecution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Vicarious copyright infringement requires a showing of supervision or control

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

In an opinion that elaborates on the degree of third-party supervision required in order to attach vicarious copyright infringement liability, the U.S

No “safe harbor” for BitTorrent website operator

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling in favor of seven film studios finding that the defendant induced

Fifth Circuit flushes away pro se plaintiff’s claims against oil giants for intellectual property theft and infringement of a “giant plunger"

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing allegations by a pro se plaintiff that oil industry giants stole and infringed her various intellectual property rights related to a “giant

CJEU confirms a trade mark can be put to genuine use when used as part of another trade mark

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 30 2013

In Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co 2013 C-1212 WLR (D) 143 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has held that a trade mark