We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,180

Supreme Court asked to clarify the reach of U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

On March 16, 2015, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc. (AU Optronics) and Motorola Mobility LLC separately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify

Creative interpretation of abandonment cannot save patent

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing a request for adverse judgment by the patent owner, the U.S Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or

Reasonable royalty damages in copyright

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing for the issue of the reasonable royalty from a hypothetical negotiation for copyrights, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

“Implausible” that scheme to induce referrals would leave physician ignorant of its true purpose

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2015

In a rare motion to dismiss ruling, a Pennsylvania federal judge rejected as “implausible” a theory that a hospital entered into on-call contracts

Protecting trade secrets insufficient to enforce covenant not to compete in any capacity worldwide

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing the enforceability of a non-compete agreement to protect trade secrets, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld a ruling

Claims must be limited to financial activities to be covered business methods

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Narrowing the application of Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, in two recent cases, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board

No acquiescence defense in Fifth Circuit without significant investment in reliance

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Clarifying that undue prejudice is a distinct requirement of the acquiescence defense, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the

No collateral estoppel in subsequent case where decision in earlier case subject to multiple possible theories

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Addressing the applicability of the collateral estoppel doctrine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that there was no

Chuck Yeager’s latest suit pulls out of nose dive

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Over the years, well-known aviation figure and retired United States Air Force general, Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager (Yeager) has been engaged in

U.S. Tax Court finds refundable state credits result in taxable income

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2015

The United States Tax Court recently determined that certain refundable tax credits issued by New York in connection with economic development