We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,189

Seventh Circuit upholds dismissal of text messaging price-fixing claims

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

On Thursday, April 9, 2015, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless LLC

Focus on tax controversy - Spring 2015

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently overturned the U.S. Tax Court in a case that could have created significant additional

When can a design patent continuation applications claim priority to a parent?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of when and under what circumstances a design patent application can receive the benefit of the written description of its parent

Unlike Inspector Clouseau, Pink Panther heirs fail to stumble on favorable theory

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2008

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed a decision against the heirs of the man who created the Pink Panther and granted copyright ownership to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Inc

Parody prevails: Louis Vuitton v Chewy Vuiton

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2007

Affirming the district court decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld judgments that Haute Diggity Dog’s “Chewy Vuiton” products neither infringe Louis Vuitton Malletier’s (LVM) copyrights nor infringe or dilute LVM’s trademarks or trade dress

Claims must be limited to financial activities to be covered business methods

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2015

Narrowing the application of Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, in two recent cases, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board

Increased federal scrutiny of laboratory-physician arrangements for potential AKS and FCA violations leads to $48.5 million settlement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2015

A recent $48.5 million False Claims Act (FCA) settlement between two laboratory companies and the federal government highlights the increased

A substantial non-infringing use does not preclude a finding of inducement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2012

In affirming-in-part, vacating-in-part and remanding a lower court’s ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a substantial non-infringing use does not preclude a finding of infringement by inducement

Defense attorneys’ billing records irrelevant in determining relator’s attorneys’ fees

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2015

On March 20, 2015, the Eastern District of California ruled in United States ex rel. Doe v. Biotronik, Inc., that defendant Biotronik Inc.’s

Supreme Court asked to clarify the reach of U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 24 2015

On March 16, 2015, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc. (AU Optronics) and Motorola Mobility LLC separately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify