We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,133

The Fourth Circuit’s triple canopy decision: implied certification versus “garden-variety” breaches of contract (and does the government’s intervention decision matter to the analysis?)

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2015

The Fourth Circuit’s January 8, 2015 decision in United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc. is notable in several respects. The decision

FCA defendant secures post-trial directed verdict in implied false certification case

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2015

In United States of America ex rel. Ortolano v. Amin Radiology, a Florida federal court recently vacated a jury’s verdict for a Relator, providing

Supreme Court vets wartime tolling of FCA statute of limitations in Kellogg Brown & Root v. United States ex rel. Carter

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 12 2015

On January 13, 2015, the Supreme Court held oral argument in the closely followed case of Kellogg Brown & Root v. United States ex rel. Carter. Two

Skinner v. Armet Armored Vehicles, Inc.: one District Court’s attempt to apply Triple Canopy

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2015

We recently posted about the Fourth Circuit's decision in United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, - F.3d -, 2015 WL 105374 (4th Cir

ALJ: New York NOL deduction does not apply when tax is not paid on income base

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2015

A New York State Division of Tax Appeals Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recently determined that a banking corporation was not required to

Supreme Court rejects Sixth Circuit’s Yard-Man inferences in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

In M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, 135 S. Ct. 935 (2015), the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the interpretation of collective

Defendant not allowed to appeal denial of a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss after trial

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a defendant cannot appeal a pretrial denial of a FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss after the plaintiff has successfully prevailed at trial on the claim at issue because the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint is irrelevant

Judge Posner orders Sherlock Holmes estate to pay attorneys’ fees for “form of extortion”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

In another scathing opinion against the Sherlock Holmes estate, Judge Richard A. Posner ordered the estate to pay attorneys’ fees for bringing

When can a design patent continuation applications claim priority to a parent?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of when and under what circumstances a design patent application can receive the benefit of the written description of its parent

Firm disqualified because preliminary injunction is “directly adverse” to another client

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 29 2015

Disqualifying Celgard’s appellate counsel due to a conflict of interest, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a non-precedential