We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,815

Federal Circuit orders stay pending completion of CBM review

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Applying section 18(a)(1) of the America Invents Act (AIA) to an issue of first impression, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

District court pares down price discrimination suit against Chrysler

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

On July 11, 2014, the Northern District of California dismissed one of two federal antitrust claims brought against Chrysler Group LLC under the

FTC promotes competition among professionals through advocacy, enforcement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

On July 16, 2014, Andrew Gavil, Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), testified on the subject of

Federal judge puts narcolepsy drug horizontal conspiracy claims to bed

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2014

On Monday, June 23, 2014, a Federal Judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment for five pharmaceutical companies on

When can a design patent continuation applications claim priority to a parent?

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of when and under what circumstances a design patent application can receive the benefit of the written description of its parent

The extent of patent coverage in offshore waters: a comparison

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • South Africa, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 5 2012

Patents are often said to be defined by their claims and, as such, are analogous in the parlance of real property to the “metes and bounds” of a deed to real property

U.S. Polo Association infringes Ralph Lauren trademark in fragrances

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that a double horse logo used on fragrances was too similar to the U.S. Polo Ralph Lauren

Claim term “adapted to” means “configured to” not just “capable of”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an obviousness rejection by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Patent Trial and

Teachings incorporated by reference for anticipation purposes need not be individually named

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 28 2009

Finding that material not explicitly contained in the single, prior art document may still be considered for purposes of anticipation if incorporated by reference into the document, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s summary judgment that patents were not invalid for anticipation

A substantial non-infringing use does not preclude a finding of inducement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2012

In affirming-in-part, vacating-in-part and remanding a lower court’s ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a substantial non-infringing use does not preclude a finding of infringement by inducement