We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,697

Release of earnings call audio recording qualifies as fair use news reporting

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has concluded that when a copyrighted work itself is considered to be news, dissemination of that

Experience Jimi Hendrix, post-mortem publicity rights

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, reversing a district court's ruling finding unconstitutional the provisions of the Washington

Claim term “adapted to” means “configured to” not just “capable of”

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an obviousness rejection by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Patent Trial and

Hookah manufacturer’s copyright infringement claims go up in smoke

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling and an award of attorneys’ fees, finding that a hookah water

Claims directed to real estate appraisal techniques not patent-eligible

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

Addressing the issue of whether claims directed to real estate appraisal techniques were patent-eligible, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board

Covered business method review is all or nothing

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

In the final written decision of the second Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) cancelled all

Well-known technology is not a “substitute fulfillment” for patent eligible subject matter

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

In a Covered Business Method (CBM) post-issuance review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cancelled all claims under review, concluding that

Computer-aided method determined ineligible under Section 101

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a decision providing a glimpse into a panel's post-Alice position with regard to

Patent powered back on by restrictive reading of 112, 6

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

Reversing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that

Copyright registration does not trigger the statute of limitation for a co-authorship claim

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

Addressing for the first time the issues of cancelation of copyright registration by a court and accrual of a joint authorship claim under the