We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 73

Joint actors as it relates to method claim infringement

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

Addressing infringement of a method claim by one or two actors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court's grant of

Cross Match Technologies files appeal with Federal Circuit in biometric scanning devices investigation

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2011

On October 18, complainant Cross Match Technologies filed a notice of appeal with the Federal Circuit of the Commission's decision in Inv. No. 337-TA-720, Certain Biometric Scanning Devices, Components Thereof, Associated Software, and Products Containing the Same

Commission declines to issue consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-568

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 14 2011

The Commission has declined to enter a consent order, and instead terminated on the basis of a settlement agreement, Inv. No. 337-TA-568, Certain Products and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Recombinant Human Erythropoetin

ALJ Bullock issues initial determination terminating the investigation as to drugstore.com

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2012

On March, 9, 2012, Chief ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent drugstore.com based on a consent order stipulation in Inv. No. 337-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof

ALJ Essex denies motion to supplement expert report

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2012

On March 6, 2012, ALJ Essex denied the Trek Complainants’ motion for leave to supplement their opening infringement expert report

ALJ Rogers denies motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party dupont and permits complainant to present live testimony of DuPont witness

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2012

On March 5, 2012, ALJ Rogers issued an order denying complainant Kaneka Corporation’s motion to quash the subpoena ad testificandum issued to E.I

ALJ Bullock denies summary determination motions in Inv. No. 337-TA-704

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2010

ALJ Bullock issued two orders denying summary determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-704, Certain Mobile Communication Devices and Components Thereof

Commission institutes Inv. No. 337-ta-740

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2010

On October 6, 2010, the Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-740, Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof, based on a complaint filed by Lexmark International, Inc. on August 20, 2010

ALJ Pender denies a non-party motion to quash but grants motion to limit subpoenas issued in 337-TA-808

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order denying non-party Openwave System Inc.’s (“Openwave”) motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum and subpoena ad testificandum served by Respondent Apple, Inc. (“Apple”

Federal Circuit reverses Commission finding in Lucky Litter LLC v. ITC

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2010

The Federal Circuit reversed the Commission’s determination of violation under section 337 and vacated the corresponding exclusion orders and cease-and-desist orders today in its opinion Lucky Litter LLC v. ITC