We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 33

Hirt v. Crestline Paving & Excavating, Inc. 2013 Ohio 200 (Ohio Ct. App., Sandusky County, Jan. 25, 2013)

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The Sixth Appellate District recently applied the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 rule on government immunity for failure to upgrade an existing sewer.1

Being responsible for your independent contractor’s fraud

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

Recently, the Second District Court of Appeals in Ohio set some parameters for when a business may be held liable for the fraudulent conduct of its

Under Coleman et al. v. Portage County Engineer, failure to upgrade sewer capacity is immune governmental function

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Sixth Appellate District recently applied the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 rule on government immunity for failure to upgrade an existing sewer.1 In

Supreme Court affirms governmental immunity in flooding case

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

Immunity is a powerful legal concept

Does a public entity have immunity for claims based on the failure to upgrade an existing sewer?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

The Supreme Court of Ohio clarified the issue of whether or not a public entity has immunity for claims based on the failure to upgrade an existing

Supreme Court hears oral argument in Class Action Fairness Act case

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

On Monday, the Court heard oral argument in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 11-1450. We previously discussed this case

Court rules that FHFA may refuse to underwrite residential mortgages for homes with PACE projects

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2013

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco overruled a district court last Tuesday when it ruled that the Federal Housing Finance

U.S. Supreme Court urged to apply “no-further-inquiry rule”to find Article III standing in no-harm class actions

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2011

On November 28, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in First American Financial Corporation, et al. v. Edwards, U.S. Supreme Court Docket No. 10-708, October 2011, on appeal from Edwards v. First Am. Corp., 610 F.3d 514 (9th Cir. 2010

What the courts are saying

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 31 2007

We begin this month with a look at a Federal Court case from the Sixth Circuit

Ohio tort reform

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2008

Two significant cases have been decided by the Ohio Supreme Court, both of which presented constitutional challenges to Ohio's 2005 Ohio tort reform law, S.B. 80