We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Health care providers take note: your contract with an HMO may require affirmative action compliance, even if it doesn’t say so

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

On March 30, 2013, the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, confirmed that contracting with an HMO to provide medical services to federal

Ohio’s smoking ban found constitutional

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2012

On May 23, 2012, in a 7-0 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Ohio Smoke Free Workplace Act (“Act”

When workers’ compensation and disabilities laws collide blind reliance on a workers’ comp order can violate the ADA, Sixth Circuit holds

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2011

The legal worlds of workers’ compensation law and the laws against disability discrimination sometimes collide and leave employers with difficult decisions about how to comply with each

Sixth Circuit rejects associational ADA discrimination claim

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2011

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee), in Stansberry v. Air Wisconsin Airlines, recently affirmed the dismissal of a former employee’s claim that he was unlawfully terminated due to his wife’s disability

Health-care providers participating in TRICARE or treating federal employees may be required to have an affirmative action plan

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2010

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) continues to target hospitals and other medical providers that it believes are federal contractors or subcontractors under Executive Order No. 11246