We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 78

Maine Supreme Court issues decision in Hannaford case, rules that time and effort spent mitigating harm from data theft do not constitute cognizable injury

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2010

This morrning, the Maine Supreme Court issued its decision in the matter of In re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, Docket No. Fed-09-586, on a question certified to the Court by the United States District Court for the District of Maine in a pending action of the same name (Docket No. 08-md-01954

Federal court finds that the proper venue for a motion to confirm an arbitration award is the district in which the hearing was held, not where the award was signed

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2010

NGC Network Asia, LLC (“NGC”) and Pacific Group International, Inc. (“PAC”) were parties to an arbitration held in New York

District court finds that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state statute barring out-of-state arbitrations

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 14 2010

In Binder v. Medicine Shoppe International, Inc., No. 09-14046 (E.D.Mich. 2010), a breach of contract dispute between the plaintiff (a franchisor) and the defendant (a franchisee) arose out of a Uniform Franchise Offering Circular and subsequent License Agreement (“Agreement”

New Hampshire Supreme Court rules that damage to the insured’s work is not a covered “occurrence”

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2010

Clarifying its prior decision in High Country Assocs. v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 139 N.H. 39 (1994), the Supreme Court of New Hampshire recently held that a CGL policy’s insuring agreement does not encompass damage to the insured’s work product

Second Circuit determines party waived its right to arbitrate

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 13 2010

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling denying the motion of plaintiffs-appellants (collectively “LSED”) to compel arbitration of a dispute with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (“MLPFS”), finding that LSED waived its right to arbitrate by litigating the case for nearly a year before filing its motion

Illinois federal court rules that reinsurer’s motion to vacate arbitration award is untimely under the Federal Arbitration Act

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2010

R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. American Motorist Ins. Co., involved a dispute arising under a series of reinsurance treaties entered into by the parties

U.S. Supreme Court rules that court lacks the authority to determine whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2010

In Rent-A-Center, West, Inc., v. Antonio Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), a federal court has the authority to address a party’s claim that an arbitration agreement is unconscionable, where the agreement explicitly delegates that decision to the arbitrator

Third Circuit revives limited portions of in re: insurance brokerage antitrust litigation (MDL 1663)

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2010

Nearly three years after a federal district court dismissed with prejudice a nationwide class action alleging antitrust and RICO claims against insurers and brokers in connection with contingent commission arrangements, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a limited swath of plaintiffs' claims

First Circuit remands D&O coverage dispute for allocation

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2010

Reversing a district court holding to the contrary, the First Circuit has declared that Massachusetts public policy does not prohibit D&O carriers from insuring against damages allegedly incurred by one class of shareholders as a result of an unfair benefit conferred on another class of shareholders

Court finds coverage excluded for shooting by security guard

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

A California Appeals Court recently held that a wrongful death action against a security guard who shot a man while on duty was excluded under an "assault and battery" exclusion, even if the security guard acted in self-defense