We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 155

Court orders disclosure of venture capital fund performance

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

California's analog to the Freedom of Information Act is the Public Records Act, Government Code 6250 et seq. In enacting the the Public

Court of Appeal rejects Omnicare in favor of jewel companies

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2011

Yesterday, the California Court of Appeal issued a brief, yet interesting, opinion that addressed several questions of California corporate law, Monty v. Leis, Cal. Ct. of Appeal (Div. 6) 2d Civil No. B225646 (March 30, 2011

Like Elmer Gantry, Supreme Court breathes new life into revivals

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2013

The state, of course, likes to see corporations pay their taxes. When a corporation fails to do so, "the corporate powers, rights and privileges of a

Court of Appeal reaffirms lender’s refusal to loan to LLC based on felonious investor in manager

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 5 2011

In May, I wrote this post about a decision by the Second District Court of Appeal finding that a lender did not violate California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act when it declined to make a loan to a limited liability company whose managing member included a convicted felon

Supreme Court resolves Janus controversy but the gates of war are not entirely closed

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2011

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders

Does the in pari delicto defense apply in derivative actions?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 21 2011

“In pari delicto” is a Latin phrase meaning in equal fault

Court rejects control requirement for director liability

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2011

Outside directors and their counsel should take note of yesterday’s decision by the First District Court of Appeal in Hellum v. Breyer

When a corporation dissolves, does the attorney-client privilege live on?

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 22 2011

Generally, a corporation’s suit for legal malpractice results in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege

A question that you may want to add to your investor suitability

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2011

Issuers typically use investor suitability questionnaires to elicit information from potential investors in order to substantiate exemptions under federal andor state securities laws

NY district court finds that same plaintiff in ars case has no California securities law claims

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2011

In this Friday the 13th post, I wrote about The Anschutz Corporation's (TAC) success in having California law apply to its negligent representation claims against the defendant New York rating agencies