Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Singapore High Court grants leave for action under section 216A of Companies Act to 50 shareholder

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
April 26 2013

The Singapore High Court in Kwee Lee Fung Ivon v Gordon Lim Clinic PTe Ltd & Anor considered an application pursuant to section 216A of the Companies

Singapore Court of Appeal considers requirements for derivative action under section 216A of Companies Act

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
February 27 2013

The Singapore Court of Appeal in Thiam Swee v Low Hian Chor clarified the law on the requirement of good faith for the purposes of applications for

Austrailain High Court underlines significance of board minutes as evidence of decisions taken at meetings

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Australia
-
June 28 2012

In Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) v Hellicar 2012 HCA 17, the Australian High Court underlined the significance of board minutes as evidence of decisions taken at meetings

Singapore High Court allows application under section 216A of the Companies Act

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
February 29 2012

Low Hian Chor v Steel Forming & Rolling Specialists Pte Ltd & Anor, leave was granted pursuant to section 216A of the Companies Act by the Singapore High Court to allow Low Hian Chor (the "Plaintiff"), a shareholder of Steel Forming & Rolling Specialists Pte Ltd (the "Defendant"), to pursue an action on behalf of the Defendant against, Ang Thiam Swee ("Ang"), a former director-shareholder of the Defendant, for breaches of director's duties owed to the Defendant

Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies discovery obligations of company subject to derivative action under section 216A of Companies Act

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
January 10 2012

In Lew Kiat Beng v Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd 2011 SGCA 61, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered and clarified the discovery obligations of a company which was the subject of a derivative action pursuant to section 216A of the Companies Act (the "Derivative Action"

Supreme Court consultation paper entitled "Review of Discovery in Civil Litigation"

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
November 1 2011

On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court announced a public consultation entitled "Review of Discovery in Civil Litigation"

Singapore High Court allows company’s claim for misappropriated property subject to confiscation order issued in favour of Public Prosecutor

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
November 1 2011

The recent Singapore High Court judgment in Public Prosecuter v Ng Teck Lee deals with various issues arising under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act

Singapore Court of Appeal considers whether binding contract arose between parties

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
China, Singapore
-
September 30 2011

IN Norwest Holdings Pte Ltd (in Liquidation) v Newport Mining Ltd and another appeal 2011 SGCA 42, the Singapore Court of Appeal concluded that the plain meaning of the "subject to contract" provisions in the relevant documents should be applied inthe circumstances of the case and that there was therefore no binding contract between the parties

Singapore Court of Appeal explores issues concerning breach of charitable purpose trust

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
August 31 2011

In Khoo Jeffery & Ors v Life Bible-Presbyterian Church & Ors, the Singapore Court of Appeal looked into questions of law relating to principles that govern the operation of unincorporated associations and religious charitable trusts

Singapore High Court finds ouster of minority shareholder as director constitutes oppression but not majority shareholder’s other ‘personal fiefdom’ acts

Allen & Gledhill LLP
-
Singapore
-
March 29 2011

The Singapore High Court in Tan Yong San v Neo Kok Eng & Ors held that the ouster of the plaintiffminority shareholder, Tan Yong San ("Tan"), as a director of various companies in the Chip Hup Group and the subsequent denial to him of access to the companies' accounts constituted oppressive conduct justifying relief under section 216 of the Companies Act

next >

Search results

Singapore High Court grants leave for action under section 216A of Companies Act to 50 shareholder

Singapore Court of Appeal considers requirements for derivative action under section 216A of Companies Act

Austrailain High Court underlines significance of board minutes as evidence of decisions taken at meetings

Singapore High Court allows application under section 216A of the Companies Act

Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies discovery obligations of company subject to derivative action under section 216A of Companies Act

Supreme Court consultation paper entitled "Review of Discovery in Civil Litigation"

Singapore High Court allows company’s claim for misappropriated property subject to confiscation order issued in favour of Public Prosecutor

Singapore Court of Appeal considers whether binding contract arose between parties

Singapore Court of Appeal explores issues concerning breach of charitable purpose trust

Singapore High Court finds ouster of minority shareholder as director constitutes oppression but not majority shareholder’s other ‘personal fiefdom’ acts

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea