Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12

California court OKs collecting consumer zip codes to combat credit card fraud

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
March 22 2012

Just over a year after it was filed, Chevron Corporation and other oil companies won dismissal of a putative privacy class action filed after the California Supreme Court's decision in Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc

Avoid being in the spotlight of California's 'Shine the Light' privacy-related law

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
March 1 2012

Eight years after California's "Shine the Light" privacy-related law (S.B

California court denies class certification in post-Pineda ZIP code case against retailer

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
December 5 2011

Recently, Judge S. James Otero of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied plaintiff Norma Rothman's class certification motion in connection with her complaint under California's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971

Retailers recording ZIP codes: class action fuel in California, uncertainty in New Jersey

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
October 11 2011

Within weeks of each other, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Hansbury and U.S. District Court Judge Wallseach ruling on a motion to dismiss a claim brought under New Jersey's Truth in Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Actdisagreed about whether such a claim may be premised on an alleged violation of New Jersey's privacy law, N.J.S.A. 56:11-17

NJ confirms its understanding of recent injunction halting enforcement of Chapter 25 against issuers of certain stored value cards

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
December 1 2010

On November 24, the New Jersey State Treasurer issued a Notice of Preliminary Injunction Concerning Enforcement of Certain Provisions of L.2010, c. 25 Related to Stored Value Cards

New Jersey District Court grantsdenies in part request for preliminary injunction in connection new unclaimed property law

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
November 16 2010

We wanted to alert you to a NJ District Court's recent ruling on a request for preliminary injunction filed in American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. v Sidamon-Eristoff, et al., (and the related actions filed by the New Jersey Retail Merchants Association, New Jersey Food Counsel and American Express Prepaid Card Management Corporation) in connection with NJ's recent adoption of a burdensome unclaimed property laws that took effect on November 15, 2010 and will impact, among other things, stored value cards

ASFA permits offset but prohibits manipulation of cost disclosures

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
July 28 2010

California's Fourth District Court of Appeal cracked down on dealership for backdating a contract and failing to itemize insurance costs in the contract

Supreme Court reduces companies' options for removing state suits to federal courts

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
June 1 2010

In response to divergent and increasingly complex interpretations among the federal courts of appeals, the United States Supreme Court has adopted the "nerve center" test for determining a corporation's "principal place of business" in applying the federal diversity jurisdiction statute

The $10 limit: court clarifies California’s law on redemption of retail gift cards

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2010

The federal District Court, Southern District of California, issued the first decisions interpreting Section 1749.5(b) of California’s Gift Card Law since its amendment in 2007 confirming that merchants have the right to refuse to redeem a gift card for cash where the balance is $10 or more

California’s ASFA construed to permit leeway in consumer disclosures

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
-
USA
-
December 22 2009

The California Third District Court of Appeal held that a dealership’s overestimation of vehicle license fees by two dollars and four-month delay in obtaining a smog check and certification do not violate California’s Rees-Levering Automobile Sales Finance Act

next >