We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 91,526

Friends of the earth: how ECJ judges have smoothed the way for applicants to bring claims in environmental cases

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • May 18 2013

R (on the application of Edwards and Pallikaropoulos) v Environment Agency (C26011) The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that in deciding

Handling e-discovery when a lawsuit is filed

  • Ryan Swanson & Cleveland PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Send out a litigation hold immediately when a lawsuit is filed or you have a reasonable expectation that matter will turn into litigation; tailor

To certify or not to certify? It's a big question

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Hunt & Others v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Others is an interesting and complex decision from the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) involving the

The Intellectual Property Court found that NexPlanar’s polishing pads do not infringe upon Rohm & Haas’s patents

  • Tsar & Tsai
  • -
  • Taiwan
  • -
  • May 17 2013

The first instance of the Intellectual Property Court rendered a decision on April 18, 2013 to dismiss entirely the patent infringement suit filed by

Missouri court holds prejudice requirement inapplicable to claims made policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

In its recent decision in Secure Energy v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69320 (E.D.Mo. May 15, 2013), the United States District

“BRIDGESTONE” trademark was confirmed to be well-known trademarks by a finalized court judgment.

  • Tsar & Tsai
  • -
  • Taiwan
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Tsar & Tsai filed an opposition on behalf of Bridgestone Japan against the registration of a third party's "BU Design" mark in medical device based

No brainer in aisle one

  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Is a grocery store entitled to a court order blocking a TV station from showing surveillance video of an altercation in the store that resulted in

The “Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf” trademark was confirmed to be a well-known trademark by a finalized court judgment.

  • Tsar & Tsai
  • -
  • Taiwan
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Tsar & Tsai filed an opposition on behalf of Infoport Management Limited ("IML") against the registration of a third party's "HSI YANG YANG" mark in

Third Circuit sides with D.C. Circuit’s determination that recess appointments are unconstitutional

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

Today, in a 102-page decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals dealt the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) a significant blow and gave

Resignation as a bargaining weapon a double-edged sword

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Threatening to resign, when used by an employee to bargain for better working conditions, is a weapon that cuts both ways. A tactic of this sort