Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 65

Everett and another v Comojo (UK) Ltd TA The Metropolitan and others 18.01.11

Kennedys
-
United Kingdom
-
March 11 2011

Nightclubs owe visitors a duty of care in respect of the actions of third parties on their premises; in this case there had been no breach of this duty

Holiday accident compensation claims

Anthony Gold Solicitors
-
United Kingdom
-
March 7 2013

With summer allegedly not too far away, people will start looking forward to warmer weather and holidays. However, with the ever-increasing use of

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd v Assicurazioni Generali SA

Norton Rose LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
June 3 2010

OEH operated the Windsor Court Hotel in New Orleans

New anti-money laundering regime to commence on 30 June 2013

Bell Gully
-
New Zealand
-
July 8 2011

The commencement of the remaining key provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AMLCFT Act) has been confirmed as 30 June 2013 by the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act Commencement Order 2011

Turpin v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
October 12 2011

An insured brought a claim against her travel insurer for medical expenses incurred while on vacation

California court addresses payment of self-insured retention

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
January 9 2012

In its recent decision in National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Federal Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 641 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had occasion to consider the issue of whether an insured was required to satisfy a self-insured retention with its own funds, or whether the retention could be paid by other insurance

Am I required to provide health insurance to employees as of 2014? Basic controlled group questions, answers and examples for hospitality employers

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
-
USA
-
December 16 2010

Beginning January 1, 2014, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will require employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees to offer health insurance

FSA gets UTCCR undertaking on consequential loss

Dentons
-
United Kingdom
-
September 19 2008

FSA has published an undertaking from UK Insurance relating to its use of the term “consequential loss” in a travel policy

Supreme Court rules on health care reform: what does this mean for employers in the hospitality industry?

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
-
USA
-
July 10 2012

Health Care Reform, in the form of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has now survived review by the Supreme Court

Massachusetts court rules for carrier in property dispute, orders return of advance

Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
-
USA
-
June 28 2011

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently concluded that an insured could not claim property insurance benefits following a fire at its restaurant, because the insured had actual knowledge that its fire-suppression system was no longer functional, and because the insured had exclusive control over the system’s maintenance

next >

Search results

Everett and another v Comojo (UK) Ltd TA The Metropolitan and others 18.01.11

Holiday accident compensation claims

Orient-Express Hotels Ltd v Assicurazioni Generali SA

New anti-money laundering regime to commence on 30 June 2013

Turpin v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.

California court addresses payment of self-insured retention

Am I required to provide health insurance to employees as of 2014? Basic controlled group questions, answers and examples for hospitality employers

FSA gets UTCCR undertaking on consequential loss

Supreme Court rules on health care reform: what does this mean for employers in the hospitality industry?

Massachusetts court rules for carrier in property dispute, orders return of advance

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea