We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently concluded that an insured could not claim property insurance benefits following a fire at its restaurant, because the insured had actual knowledge that its fire-suppression system was no longer functional, and because the insured had exclusive control over the system’s maintenance
In the case of Sugar Hut Group Ltd & Ors v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc & Ors 2010 EWHC 2636 (Comm) Mr Justice Burton reaffirmed the English Court's approach to non-disclosure and breach of warranty
