We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Standards and patents: lessons from the Rambus cases

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • China, USA
  • -
  • June 13 2008

In recent years, China's electronics industry has struggled to compete in the manufacture and sale of products ranging from MP3 players to digital TVs

Hatch-Waxman reverse payment settlement is lawful under antitrust laws since anticompetitive effects were within the exclusionary zone of the the exclusionary zone of the patent

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2008

In In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-1097 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2008), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of SJ, holding that reverse payment settlement agreements were not in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act