We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 82

Technology newsletter - September edition - Industry news

  • Rouse Legal
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • September 15 2014

SoundCloud, the self-proclaimed ‘social sound platform’, has been an effective tool at getting new music out in the public domain quickly and to a

Munich office IPIT & media newsletter - August 2014

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Germany
  • -
  • August 6 2014

Under the auspices of the Bavarian state data protection authority, the so-called Düsseldorfer Kreis (an association of all German data privacy

High Court allows DRI to join as amicus curiae to Facebook privacy case

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union, Ireland
  • -
  • July 21 2014

The High Court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (No.2) 2014 IEHC 351has granted an order joining Digital Rights Ireland (DRI) as amicus

Technology newsletter - Case Summaries

  • Rouse Legal
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 15 2014

Earlier this year Lush won a big victory against Amazon when the High Court found that it had infringed Lush’s trade marks. But many wondered what

A summary of major developments in key areas - General Counsel update - May 2014

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Germany, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2014

Scottish independence referendum - The referendum will take place on 18 September 2014. Scottish independence raises many complex legal and political

IP&T hot topics - UK & Europe

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 4 2014

The legal challenges faced by businesses are constantly evolving. The law often changes at a rapid pace to keep up with the evolution of global

ECJ ruling on meta search engines strengthens position of database right holders

  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • January 13 2014

In a landmark decision, the EU Court of Justice held that the mere offering of a dedicated meta search engine infringes database rights since it

General Counsel Update - June 2013 - A summary of major developments in key areas

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • June 21 2013

The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 (Regulations) to amend the structure of UK annual reports have

CJEU judgment on jurisdiction for Football Dataco v Sportradar

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • October 25 2012

Last week the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that where a website operator targets and then provides material infringing sui generis database rights to recipients based in an EU Member State over the internet, the act of infringement occurs at least in the EU Member State where those recipients are located

AG's Sportradar opinion: database right infringement takes place both in state of server storage and the state where customers received the data

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 4 2012

In a reference by the Court of Appeal in a case involving allegations of infringement of UK sui generis database right by services provided from servers outside the jurisdiction (Football Dataco & Ors v Sportradar GmbH & Sportradar, C-17311) the Advocate General (AG) has opined:Where a party uploads data from a database protected by the sui generis right onto that party’s web server located in Member State A and, in response to requests from a user in another Member State B, the web server sends such data to the user’s computer so that the data is stored in the memory of that computer and displayed on its screen, the act of sending the information constitutes an act of ‘re-utilisation’ (and hence infringement) by that party and the act of re-utilisation performed by that party takes place both in Member State A and in Member State B