We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

ECJ finds for Google on AdWords but advertisers beware

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France
  • -
  • May 4 2010

In what is likely to be seen as a set-back for brand owners, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held that Google is not liable for trade mark infringement with its AdWords system

European Court of Justice delivers Google AdWords decision

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • March 24 2010

On 23 March 2010, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its judgment in the three Google adwords cases (between Google and Louis Vuitton Malletier SA; Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL; and Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Tiger SARL

Google’s AdWords should not be held to infringe trade marks, says Advocate General

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union
  • -
  • October 16 2009

In a blow for Australian brand owners who have or plan to have a stake in the European market, the Advocate General who is the legal advisor to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has stated that the Google AdWords system does not infringe third party trade mark rights

Google’s AdWords should not be held to infringe trade marks, says Advocate General

  • Norton Rose LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • September 30 2009

In a blow for brand owners, the legal advisor to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has stated that the Google AdWords system does not infringe third party trade mark rights