We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Patent reform redeux

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

On March 4, 2010, just a few weeks after Senator Leahy (D-Vt.) announced a bipartisan agreement on a patent reform bill, the Senate Judiciary Committee introduced a new U.S. patent bill, S.515, directed toward resolving legislative differences and making U.S. patent law more compatible with international laws

Registration requirement does not restrict a subject-matter jurisdiction over infringement claims involving unregistered works

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2010

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held that although the Copyright Act’s registration requirement, 17 U.S.C. 411(a), is a precondition to filing a copyright infringement claim, a copyright holder’s failure to comply with that requirement does not restrict a federal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over infringement claims involving unregistered works

Supreme Court holds that Copyright Act does not restrict a federal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over infringement claims involving unregistered works

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2010

On March 2, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a decision holding that the Copyright Act's requirement that copyright owners must register their works before suing for copyright infringement is not jurisdictional, such that federal district courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over infringement claims involving unregistered works