We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Court not lured by arguments for attorneys’ fees

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 28 2009

In a patent infringement suit about fishing lures, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stated that the appellant “provided no support whatsoever for its claims”, and affirmed the district court’s decision to deny granting attorneys’ fees

Growing gaps in the ED Texas venue net

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2009

On the same day, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit issued two decisions on petitions for writ arising from motions to transfer venue out of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (ED Texas

Fifth Circuit speaks out again on venue transfers

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2009

The Fifth Circuit denied a petition for writ of mandamus to direct transfer of a case from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, notwithstanding a forum selection clause between the parties that designated California