We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 74

What do you get when you cross March madness with insurance?

  • Gilbert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2014

A chance to win one billion dollars. Quicken Loans and Berkshire Hathaway recently announced that they are teaming up to award one billion dollars to

Forgery of Renoir not covered by insurance

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 15 2010

Here is a hard lesson for owners of valuable art concerning their insurance policy: if it turns out that Old Master is a forgery, your insurance policy may not cover the "loss" you allegedly sustained by reason of the forgery

Financial services legislative and regulatory update - May 21 2012

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • China, USA
  • -
  • May 21 2012

The news last week was clearly dominated by JP Morgans trading loss

Insurance coverage for Lanham Act false advertising claims

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2012

A recent article, “Insurance Coverage for False Advertising Claims,” which was published in the March 2012 issue of Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin, discusses some of the caselaw holding that insurance companies are obligated to provide coverage for false advertising claims, particularly under the advertising injury section of a CGL policy

Ticketmaster wins reversal, possible coverage for class action over ticket fees

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Reversing a federal district court decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Illinois Union Insurance Company may be on

Wisconsin Supreme Court finds judgment for copyright and trademark infringement claim falls within coverage for “advertising injury”

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2008

In Acuity v. Bagadia, Nos. 2006AP1153 & 2006AP1974, 2008 Wisc. LEXIS 314 (Wisc. June 18, 2008), the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court’s decision finding an insurer liable for a judgment entered against the insured for copyright and trademark infringement under the commercial general liability policy’s coverage for “advertising injury.”

New cyber-policies in the marketplace

  • Lowenstein Sandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2008

Most companies have either limited or no coverage for advertising-related claims, intellectual property infringement and invasion of privacy claims

Risk management? Red Sox will have to sweep the World Series this year for fans to get free furniture

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2008

Last fall, we posted about a New England furniture company that, backed by prize indemnification insurance, offered customers the chance to get their furniture purchase for free if the Boston Red Sox won the World Series

Insurance for advertising injury covers claims of defamation under New York law

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2007

A federal judge recently ruled that because an underlying complaint filed against an insured included allegations of negligent and reckless defamation under New York law, an insurer had a duty to defend its insured

No coverage for false advertising claims under three separate policies

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2010

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that multiple insurers had no obligation to defend or indemnify a policyholder against suits filed by a competitor and consumers alleging false and deceptive advertising