Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37

Use and operation of a vehicle

Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
-
Canada
-
April 17 2008

The statutory language "use and operation of a vehicle" was recently the subject of judicial interpretation in the context of no-fault benefits provided pursuant to section B of the Alberta Standard Automobile Policy in Arruda (Estate) v. Allstate Insurance Company

Drive-by shootings use or operation of an automobile?

Miller Thomson LLP
-
Canada
-
October 20 2009

We live in a car culture

Guardian Insurance v. York Fire re-visited

Miller Thomson LLP
-
Canada
-
October 20 2009

In ING Insurance Company v. Lombard General Insurance Company of Canada, Mr. Justice Jennings considered the priority in which polices of insurance were required to respond to claims following a motor vehicle accident

First Canadian Title v. The Law Society of New Brunswick

McCarthy Tétrault LLP
-
Canada
-
October 31 2009

What are the limits on the powers of self-governing professional bodies?

Non-earner benefits when is a claim made?

Miller Thomson LLP
-
Canada
-
May 27 2010

The recent FSCO decision of Mannarino and ING (A08-000388) dealt with the issue of when a claim is made for non-earner benefits

Finlay v. Van Paassen - a registrar’s order dismissing an action will near always be set aside

Miller Thomson LLP
-
Canada
-
May 27 2010

The action arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred October 2003

Hruska v. Bridges Golf Club Ltd

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
October 14 2010

The Plaintiff Insured was a passenger in a golf cart driven by a third party along a golf cart path on the premises of the Defendant Bridges Golf Course

Beware indemnify a Canadian company and you may just find yourself stuck in a Canadian court

McMillan LLP
-
Canada
-
October 15 2010

A foreign company's agreement to indemnify an Ontario co-defendant may influence a court to assume jurisdiction over the foreign company as well, according to a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal

Decision on production of surveillance pursuant to PIPEDA

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
-
Canada
-
July 19 2010

The July 9, 2010 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal has provided guidance on whether a plaintiff in a personal injury tort action may obtain access to information over which solicitor-client privilege is claimed, by making a request under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”

Seized car incriminating evidence who pays the car pound?

Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
-
Canada
-
March 31 2010

The Court of Appeal recently provided an answer to this question in Aviva, compagnie d’assurances du Canada c. Quebec (Procureur général

next >

Search results

Use and operation of a vehicle

Drive-by shootings use or operation of an automobile?

Guardian Insurance v. York Fire re-visited

First Canadian Title v. The Law Society of New Brunswick

Non-earner benefits when is a claim made?

Finlay v. Van Paassen - a registrar’s order dismissing an action will near always be set aside

Hruska v. Bridges Golf Club Ltd

Beware indemnify a Canadian company and you may just find yourself stuck in a Canadian court

Decision on production of surveillance pursuant to PIPEDA

Seized car incriminating evidence who pays the car pound?

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea