We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal placed significant limitations on the statutory definition of a catastrophic impairment as outlined in Ontario Regulation 46196
The July 9, 2010 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Attorney General of Canada has provided guidance on whether a plaintiff in a personal injury tort action may obtain access to information over which solicitor-client privilege is claimed, by making a request under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”
On October 29, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Herman J. in Martin et al v. Fleming et al, in which she determined that no ambiguity exists in s. 267.5(7) of the Insurance Act, which deals with the application of statutory deductibles
