We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

The Court of Appeal on D&O policies: the "Steigrad decision"

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • February 14 2013

In the hectic run up to Christmas last year, we sent you a brief advisory note on the reversal by the Court of Appeal of the High Court's

Bridgecorp decision overturned

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • January 17 2013

In a judgment that will be welcomed by both insurers and insureds, the New Zealand Court of Appeal has confirmed that, contrary to the first instance

Bridgecorp appeal: the latest on defence costs under a D&O policy and the application of a statutory charge

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • January 14 2013

Should companies purchase a defence costs only policy, separate to their D&O policy, to cover their directors and officers? This has been a live

Good news for directors and officers - successful appeal against Bridgecorp decision

  • Cooper Grace Ward
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • January 8 2013

An earlier judgment that suggested that directors may be unable to rely on Directors' and Officers' (D&O) liability insurance to fund defence costs has

Bridgecorp decision overturned by Court of Appeal of New Zealand

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • January 2 2013

On 20 December 2012 the Court of Appeal of New Zealand overturned the first instance decision in Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Limited (Bridgecorp), finding that a

New Zealand Court of Appeal overturns Bridgecorp decision

  • Colin Biggers & Paisley
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

Today the New Zealand Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Ltd & Ors COA CA6742011 20 December 2012. The Court of Appeal has

Appeal court overturns controversial liability insurance decision

  • Chapman Tripp
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • December 20 2012

Directors can take comfort from the Court of Appeal decision today overturning the High Court’s controversial interpretation of section 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 in Steigrad & Ors v BFSL 2007 Limited & Ors

Duties of banker to its customer to not extend to collateral interests

  • Buddle Findlay
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • July 12 2012

The case of JoJaro Investments Limited v ASB Bank Limited involved a senior employee of an insurance company who stole nearly $4 million that the company had set aside to maintain its credit rating

Steigrad v BFSL 2007 Limited: defence costs precluded by statutory charge over insurance monies

  • Hunt & Hunt
  • -
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • -
  • November 29 2011

A decision in this matter was handed down by the New Zealand High Court on 15 September 2011 that may have significant ramifications in Australia

D&O insurance policies: will your defence costs be covered?

  • Bell Gully
  • -
  • New Zealand
  • -
  • October 5 2011

In a recent High Court decision concerning a claim by the receivers of Bridgecorp against the Bridgecorp directors, the court ruled section 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 gave Bridgecorp a charge over all insurance money payable under a directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance policy, and that the charge had priority over any claim by the Bridgecorp directors to defence costs under the policy