We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, in an unpublished decision, has ruled that the pollution exclusion in a directors and officers insurance policy does not bar coverage for defense costs and damages arising from an underlying suit alleging securities misrepresentations regarding contingent liabilities for pollution claims
