We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 95

Passage of Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in the US opens the door for personalized medicine

  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 29 2008

On May 21, President Bush signed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA

Proposed regulations on grandfathered plans under new health care law issued

  • Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 23 2010

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and the Treasury have proposed "interim final" regulations defining the circumstances under which an existing health care plan will lose its status as a "grandfathered plan" under the new health care law

Seventh Circuit clarifies that defendants may remove class actions unless it is “legally impossible” for $5 million or more to be at stake

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2011

In a pair of recent decisions, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that federal courts have jurisdiction over a class action that has been removed from state court when a defendant estimates that the $5 million amount-in-controversy requirement has been met, unless the plaintiff can show that it would be legally impossible to recover that amount

Exclusion for sexual misconduct precludes duty to defend employer

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 14 2011

Applying Texas law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that an exclusion for claims "arising out of" sexual misconduct applied to bar coverage for a medical group for a lawsuit alleging that its employee sexually assaulted a patient. Nat'l Fire Ins

Exclusion for sexual misconduct precludes duty to defend against employer

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2011

Applying Texas law, the United States Court of Appeals has held that an exclusion for claims “arising out of” sexual misconduct applied to bar coverage for a medical group for a lawsuit alleging that its employee sexually assaulted a patient

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2008

On May 21, 2008, President George W. Bush signed into law “The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008” (H.R. 493; hereinafter “GINA”

EEOC suggests some required health risk assessments violate ADA

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2009

Employers who require their employees to participate in a health risk assessment in order to be eligible for health insurance coverage may be unknowingly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA

Medicare settlement reporting requirements; MDL master complaints after Twombly and Iqbal; and ex parte communication with treating physicians in an MDL setting

  • Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2010

Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (“MMSEA” or “Section 111”), 42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(8), obligates entities that resolve certain claims with Medicare beneficiaries to report details of the settlement to the federal government

New IRS guidance for health care reform: more news you can use

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2011

Health care reform requires employers to report the cost of health coverage on employees' W-2 forms

FAQs issued on the summary of benefits in coverage

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2012

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury have jointly issued another set of FAQs on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the health care reform law