We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 434

Federal judges in Brooklyn are making it easier to pursue fraud claims against no-fault medical providers

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The Eastern District of New York, which includes the New York City Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, has been home to some of the most colorful

Eighth Circuit: broad service of suit provision in insurance policy endorsement precludes arbitration

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

In a prior post, we reported the district court's denial of the insurer's motion to compel arbitration in Union Electric Co. v. Aegis Energy

That's not what I meant either! -- Ambiguous drafting thwarts (one party's version of its) intent, again

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

A few weeks ago I posted about an Eighth Circuit case that once again illustrated how, despite the drafter's precision carrying the day most of the

Federal courts can enjoin state court litigation of arbitrable claims

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

In a new case that reminds federal judges everywhere to sing "I've got the power!" like C&C Music Factory, the Fifth Circuit reiterates that federal

Court compels arbitration in reinsurance dispute

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

New Jersey Physicians United Reciprocal Exchange ("NJ Pure") filed a complaint claiming that its reinsurer breached a 2007 reinsurance contract under

European Parliament's consideration of IMD2 postponed

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • April 30 2013

On 12 April 2013, it was confirmed through an update to the European Parliament's procedure file that the Parliament's consideration of the proposed

Endorsement preemption: Eighth Circuit says forum selection endorsement supersedes policy's arbitration provision

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

In Union Electric Company v. AEGIS Energy Syndicate 1225, No. 12-3546, 2013 WL 1688859 (8th Cir. Apr. 19, 2013), the US Court of Appeals for the

Court considers reinsurance contacts covering September 11 losses

  • Vedder Price PC
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 24 2013

The case arose from a tribunal award relating to reinsurance contracts covering losses arising out of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre

Insurance disputes held to be not subject to arbitration

  • Jenner & Block
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

The Washington State Supreme Court upheld the lower court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration of an insurance coverage dispute on grounds that

UK insurer barred from enforcing mandatory arbitration provision in coverage dispute with Missouri insured

  • Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

In Union Electric Co. v. AEGIS Energy Syndicate 1225, No. 12-3546 (8th Cir. April 19, 2013), the court held that a UK insurer was precluded from