We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 20,814

UK Supreme Court to consider whether recoverable success fees ATE premiums breach Article 6 rights

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 29 2014

In a judgment handed down last Wednesday, 23 July, the Supreme Court said it was open to the Court to reconsider whether a claimant's right to

E-cigarettes: no e-smoke without e-fire

  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 31 2014

With e-cigarette use on the rise in the UK are the risks associated with these products a pressing issue for the general insurance industry? When an

Deposit insurance assessment system

  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) recently published for comment a proposed rule containing modifications to the deposit insurance

Captive insurance: feds promote tax benefits, but pay attention to the details

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

Recent IRS rulings and a U.S. Tax Court decision continue to lay a solid foundation for captive insurance companies. However, the tax requirements

6th circuit: excess insurance triggered by primary’s refusal to defend

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

When a primary insurer improperly refused to provide coverage, an excess insurer should have stepped in, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court recently ruled

“Insured v. insured” exclusion in D&O policy doesn’t preclude coverage to bank execs for FDIC suit

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • Puerto Rico, USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico held that a D&O policy's "insured v. insured" exclusion did not foreclose coverage

Washington Supreme Court rules that it was error to delay adjudication of insurer's duty to defend, but should stay discovery as to insurer's coverage defenses

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The Washington Supreme Court handed down two holdings that should significantly benefit policyholders. Recognizing that a duty to defend is

Insured person under CGL policy did not include supervisory employee

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Applying a limited reading of an insured's policy providing coverage for "directors," the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a

Sixth Circuit clarifies scope of Medicare Secondary Payer liability for non-group health plans

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

On July 16, 2014, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that a "health care provider can bring the Medicare Secondary Payer Act's ("MSP's"

Summary judgment granted in claim for subrogated damages:

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The action arose after the plaintiff, a pharmaceutical company, entered into an agreement (the "Agreement") with one of the defendants, UPS SCS