We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 9,677

New York court allows disgorgement coverage action to proceed

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

In its recent decision in J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co., 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1465 (NY June 11, 2013), New York's Court of Appeals -

Two significant pieces of insurance legislation passed during the 83rd Texas Legislative Session and how they will impact businesses in Texas

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

Two pieces of insurance legislation, passed during the 83rd Texas Legislative Session, are of great significance to businesses in Texas. SB 1332

Recent changes in the regulatory framework for Texas insurance holding companies

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

In an effort to move its regulatory framework for the registration of insurance holding company systems more in conformity with the National

One word can make all the difference: a refresher on New York’s statutory prohibitions against “tying” title insurance to mortgage financing

  • Herrick Feinstein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

Lawyers know to choose their words carefully. Why? Because one word can make all the difference, especially when it comes time for a borrower to

Advances in cyber insurance risk management services help protect against data loss but more can be done

  • Experian® Data Breach Resolution
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

Insurance against data loss has developed rapidly to protect organizations from the economic consequences of a data breach. Insurance companies have

New York Court of Appeals embraces a more policyholder friendly stance on insurer’s duty to defend

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

Policyholders received a boost of support from a New York Court of Appeals on Tuesday when the court held that an insurer is precluded from using

Health Care Reform Update, June 17th 2013

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

On June 14th, CMS released a proposed rule with program integrity guidelines for the Health Insurance Marketplace. Among other things, the proposed

HHS releases proposed rule aimed at oversight of health insurance exchanges

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

On June 14, 2013, HHS released a proposed rule containing many provisions aimed at oversight of federally-facilitated exchanges (FFEs), state health

PSO reminder: hospitals need to contract with a PSO in order to participate in state insurance exchanges

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

Hospitals with 50 or more beds will not be able to provide services through qualified health plans working with state insurance exchanges under the

Underwriting exclusion bars coverage for claim for failure to notify life insurance applicants of adverse test results obtained as part of application process

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

The Iowa Supreme Court, applying Iowa law, has affirmed a lower court's application of an underwriting exclusion to bar coverage for a claim against