We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 840

No cover for defence costs for director

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The plaintiff, Kyriakou, was a former director of various companies within the Australvic group (Australvic

Ted Baker v AXA Insurance UK Ltd 2012 EWHC 1406 (Comm)

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 11 2012

Ted Baker (TB) sold merchandise through retail outlets

“Arising out of” uncertainty

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 11 2012

Courts cannot seem to agree on how the words “arising out of” are to be read, particularly in relation to policies of insurance

Disclosure novelties for insurers in WA courts

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The rules governing civil procedure in the Western Australian Supreme and District Courts were recently amended by adopting a new Order 9A (Order 9A

Proving causation in loss of chance cases

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 11 2012

The NSW Court of Appeal recently considered the relevant principles to be applied in loss of chance cases and in particular the essential requirement to prove causation

Interpreting contracts of insurance

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 11 2012

A recent decision of the Supreme court of Queensland once again highlights that the terms of a contract of insurance are to be construed by reference to what a reasonable person armed with knowledge of the surrounding circumstances at the time of entry into the contract would consider the terms to mean

Quebec Court of Appeal orders insurer to indemnify investors swindled out of savings by their financial adviser

  • Norton Rose Canada LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 11 2012

On August 2, 2012, the Quebec Court of Appeal, per the Honourable Marie-France Bich, J.A., handed down a unanimous decision in Alimentation Denis et Mario Guillemette inc. and upheld the judgment of the Honourable François Huot, J.S.C., ordering an insurer to pay $460,000 to investors who had lost their life savings as a result of negligent acts committed by their financial planner and the firms for which he worked

AXN v Worboys 2012 EXHC 1730 (QB)

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 11 2012

A taxi driver sexually assaulted a number of women in his taxi after persuading them to accept alcoholic drinks laced with sedatives

Financial sector resolution: broadening the regime

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 11 2012

HM Treasury has published a consultation document entitled Financial sector resolution: broadening the regime

Loss adjuster’s reports declared privileged

  • Norton Rose Australia
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • September 11 2012

In the case of Ensham Resources Pty Ltd v AIOI Insurance Company Limited 2012 FCA 710 the Federal Court of Australia upheld an insurer’s claim of legal professional privilege over a loss adjuster’s reports irrespective of their being prepared several years before litigation was commenced