We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 160

My sweet lords: Court of Appeal hands down emphatic judgment in Harrison & Harrison v Black Horse Limited

  • Squire Sanders Hammonds
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 12 2011

Earlier today, at 9:45am on 12 October 2011, the Court of Appeal handed down its long-awaited judgment in Harrison & Harrison v Black Horse Limited 2011 A320102996 dealing with the claim of unfair relationship under Section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the “CCA 1974”

PPACA - Day 1

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2012

Today's arguments at the Supreme Court were 90 minutes on the issue of whether the Court has jurisdiction to decide the constitutional questions now, or if the challengers must wait until the individual mandate and its associated penalities begin in 2014

UK financial services regulation: up-date on the progress of the government’s reforms

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 18 2013

In June 2010, in the wake of the financial crisis of 20072008, the Government announced its plans to abolish the Financial Services Authority (‘FSA’

You’re simply the best! Court dismisses another PPI mis-selling claim in Best v Black Horse Limited

  • Squire Sanders Hammonds
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 5 2011

Earlier today His Honour Judge Birtles handed down judgment in Keith Best v Black Horse Limited (2011), Unreported, Central London County Court, on two common arguments in payment protection insurance (“PPI”) mis-selling claims

New law prohibits genetic discrimination

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 30 2008

On May 21, 2008 President Bush signed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA

One amendment, two amendment, three amendment and, erm, four? Court of Appeal refuses borrowers permission for another walk in the park

  • Squire Sanders Hammonds
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 6 2011

Courts have been faced with a substantial number of claims alleging the mis-selling of payment protection insurance

NAIC releases draft regulation on medical loss ratios; expresses concerns over implementation

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2010

On October 14, 2010, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Health Insurance and Managed Care Committee approved model regulations relating to insurer calculation of medical loss ratio (MLR) for health coverages as required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA

Supreme Court grants permission to appeal on unfair relationship provisions in Harrison & Harrison v Black Horse Limited

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 12 2012

Introduction On 21 February 2012, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom gave Mr & Mrs Harrison permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s emphatic decision in Harrison & Harrison v Black Horse Limited 2011 EWCA Civ 1128 which considered whether the taking of an undisclosed commission (when there was no regulatory obligation to disclose the existence or amount of the commission) created an “unfair relationship” under Section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

More consitutional decisions on PPACA

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 13 2010

The constitutional challenges to PPACA keep coming in

A fire in Camden Town...and a timely reminder for insurance brokers

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 22 2011

The Commercial Court has recently handed down a judgment touching on a key issue for insurers, insureds and brokers alike: is a broker under a duty to draw the imposition by an insurer of a risk improvement measure which had a material and potentially deleterious effect on the insureds' cover, to their clients' attention and to obtain their instructions in relation to it?