We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Supreme Court of Virginia justices focused on the role of intent in determining whether an "accident" takes place under commercial general liability (CGL) policies and whether application of the pollution exclusion properly was before them during oral argument held April 19, 2011 in The AES Corporation v. Steadfast Insurance Company (AES), the first coverage suit addressing claims for losses allegedly caused by contributions to global climate change
