We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,027

Delaware court: settlement for statutory damages, calculated without reference to actual damages incurred, is for penalty, not covered loss

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A Delaware trial court has held that a settlement for statutory damages paid by a health care organization represents uncovered penalties rather than

California state law does not bar defense for federal prosecution

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

An intermediate appellate court in California has held that Section 533.5(b) of the state insurance code does not apply to preclude insurance

Court dismisses claim for coverage for a first-party loss under a third-party liability policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas has dismissed a claim for coverage under a directors and officers (D&O) liability

Allegations of misleading statements regarding scope of coverage not sufficient to support insureds’ fraud claim

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Applying California law, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California has dismissed a claim by insured directors and

Prior knowledge exclusion bars coverage where law firm’s mistake allowed a seller to void client’s deal

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Applying Indiana law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that no coverage was available for a law firm that failed

Fraud exclusion bars coverage for suit against bank regarding life insurance premium loans

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

The United States District Court for the Central District of California has held that no coverage is available for a suit against an insured bank

Bond exclusion and insured vs. insured exclusions bar coverage for claims against property management company

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

A California federal district court has held that a bond exclusion in a professional liability policy issued to a property management company and the

Court of Appeals affirms that "in fact" requirement was triggered by jury’s guilty verdict

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Applying Illinois and Florida law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed that a jury's guilty verdict in a criminal

"Based upon, arising from, or in consequence of" language in exclusion requires causal connection, not proximate causation

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico has held that a "Lending Services" exclusion in a D&O policy barred coverage for a

Wrongful acts "related" if there is factual tie between acts

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 16 2013

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, applying New York law, held that the term "related" in a professional