We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

“Covered or not covered: that is the question” - a discussion of directors & officers insurance coverage issues

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2011

It is important that directors and officers insurance provide the necessary protections

Insurers accorded standing to challenge asbestos bankruptcy plan that potentially limits insurers’ reinsurance recoveries

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2012

Asbestos settlement trusts are a major source of payment of asbestos claims in the United States, with over fifty such trusts instituted as of March, 2011

Recent cases may signal a trend for U.S. courts to accord insurers increased rights to object to the institution of an asbestos settlement trust

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2011

An article by the National Underwriter Company discusses a recent Moody’s report that asbestos claims are again on the rise after years of declining or flat claims

Rhode Island court approves, for the first time, a solvent insurer's commutation plan

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2011

Under the laws of the UK and Bermuda, solvent insurance companies that had ceased to write new policies have long been able to implement an orderly and expeditious run off of their businesses through court approved schemes of arrangement

Does “dodd-frank” allow for a federal liquidator of an insurance company?

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2011

The short answer to the title question is "no."